Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change default signature level from None to Overloads #1481

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

JPercival
Copy link
Contributor

@JPercival JPercival commented Dec 19, 2024

  • The None default for Signature level can cause the CQL compiler to generate ELM that's ambiguous at runtime. This PR changes the default to the minimum level to ensure the generated ELM is unambiguous for overloads.

Copy link

Formatting check succeeded!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.46%. Comparing base (545e77e) to head (29b2cbd).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1481      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     64.45%   64.46%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     1936     1939       +3     
============================================
  Files           494      494              
  Lines         28168    28168              
  Branches       5598     5598              
============================================
+ Hits          18156    18159       +3     
+ Misses         7754     7750       -4     
- Partials       2258     2259       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JPercival JPercival marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2024 22:18
@JPercival JPercival merged commit b9f7ad3 into master Dec 20, 2024
7 checks passed
@JPercival JPercival deleted the feature-safe-options branch December 20, 2024 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants